There is an important distinction that can be made between an engineering investigations and what is commonly termed a forensic engineering investigation, according to Richard Nellis, Vice President and Manager of the Forensic Division at KCL.
In fact, according to Richard, a more accurate term would be a forensic failure assessment. The assessment uses a sophisticated methodology that was originally developed by the National Fire Prevention Association when they were developing a standardized methodology for investigating fires and explosions (NFPA 921).
The methodology, reports Richard, involves defining the problem, collecting the necessary data, analyzing the data, and developing & testing a hypothesis. After these prescribed steps are taken the forensic engineer would put forth a final hypothesis. KCL has led the way in Canada in perfecting the methodology.
Before the standard was introduced forensic investigations of buildings and structures was often conducted on a somewhat formal basis.
In today’s world, forensic engineers utilize a much more scientific approach that looks at the design, installation, maintenance and many other factors that enables not only an accurate assessment but also produces an evaluation that can be supported with scientific data.
To learn more about forensic engineering visit: http://www.kcl.ca/forensic-engineering.html
Or contact Richard at
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
|
