At Kleinfeldt, we assess a broad range of engineering failures. Each failure is unique and requires a thorough investigation and assessment. In order to ensure quality control, we provide a consistent and systematic approach by applying the same process to every assessment of cause.

We use the scientific method to ensure credibility in forensic engineering assessments and the resulting conclusions. The scientific method is a recognized procedure that is applied to the collection, analysis, and assessment of information. The appropriate application of this process helps us develop an understanding of the relevance and significance of information, and helps us determine any contributing factors to the occurrence.

Our assessments follow the scientific method, as illustrated in the figure above, as a recognized procedure for all engineering analysis. The procedure helps define the scope of the assessment, focus the research, defend the work, and support conclusions.

The Kleinfeldt Process, which uses the scientific method as a blueprint, enables our engineers to work their way back to the cause of the failure for each assessment. This formalized approach develops and systematically tests their understanding of the failure to be sure that it complies with sound engineering and scientific principles.

The scientific method is applied to all Kleinfeldt forensic engineering assessments, ranging through failures in design, construction, and maintenance. Some examples of these forensic investigations include slips/trips and falls, stair falls, product liability, structural failure, vehicle and bicycle impacts, and snow and ice control assessments.

The Kleinfeldt Process is used to successfully develop and present clear and supportable understanding of any occurrence, such that a knowledgeable person would interpret the evidence in the same manner and arrive at the same conclusions.